From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dearwester v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2015
No. 2:13-cv-1250-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-1250-CMK-P

04-02-2015

FRANK LEE DEARWESTER, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). A finding of "exceptional circumstances" requires an evaluation of both the likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims on his own in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Terrell, 935 F.2d at 1017. Neither factor is dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision. See id.

In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff has demonstrated sufficient writing ability and legal knowledge to articulate his claim. Plaintiff is challenging the constitutionality of a California statute, and appears sufficiently capable of articulating the issue, which does not appear to be overly complex. In his motion, plaintiff states that he has limited legal knowledge, that his incarceration will hinder his ability to litigate this case, and he cannot afford counsel. The court finds the limitations insufficient to meet the "exceptional circumstances" requirement or establish that plaintiff cannot articulate his claims without counsel. In addition, given the facts as alleged in the complaint, it does not appear likely at this stage of the proceedings, that plaintiff will succeed on the merits.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Doc. 12) is denied. DATED: April 2, 2015

/s/_________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Dearwester v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 2, 2015
No. 2:13-cv-1250-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Dearwester v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LEE DEARWESTER, Plaintiff, v. EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., et al…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 2, 2015

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-1250-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 2, 2015)