From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Irwin

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
May 16, 2018
No. 236 (Or. Ct. App. May. 16, 2018)

Opinion

No. 236 A159989

05-16-2018

Sandy DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan IRWIN, Defendant-Respondent.

Travis Eiva argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Michael H. Bloom and Michael H. Bloom, P.C. Andrew D. Glascock argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Curtis M. Burns and Hiefield Foster & Glascock, LLP.


Multnomah County Circuit Court
14CV08016;

Kathleen M. Dailey, Judge.

Travis Eiva argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Michael H. Bloom and Michael H. Bloom, P.C.

Andrew D. Glascock argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Curtis M. Burns and Hiefield Foster & Glascock, LLP.

Before Hadlock, Presiding Judge, and DeHoog, Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed. Durette v. Virgil, 272 Or App 545, 356 P3d 639, rev den, 358 Or 527 (2015); Thoens v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Oregon, 272 Or App 512, 356 P3d 91 (2015).


Summaries of

Dean v. Irwin

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
May 16, 2018
No. 236 (Or. Ct. App. May. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Dean v. Irwin

Case Details

Full title:Sandy DEAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jonathan IRWIN, Defendant-Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON

Date published: May 16, 2018

Citations

No. 236 (Or. Ct. App. May. 16, 2018)