From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dean v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2013
No. 2: 10-cv-1355 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2: 10-cv-1355 MCE JFM (PC)

02-26-2013

ALTON E. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. KATHRYN M. GONZALES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. (See Dkt. No. 68.) The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 68.) is DENIED.

_____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Dean v. Gonzales

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 26, 2013
No. 2: 10-cv-1355 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Dean v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:ALTON E. DEAN, Plaintiff, v. KATHRYN M. GONZALES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 26, 2013

Citations

No. 2: 10-cv-1355 MCE JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2013)