From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

DE Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. M/V One Apus in rem

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2021
21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (BCM)

12-08-2021

DE WELL CONTAINER SHIPPING, INC., Plaintiff, v. M/V ONE APUS in rem, CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A., NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD., OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD.. HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLCHAFT, and HMM CO., LTD. fk a HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE CO., LTD., Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

To conserve resomces, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge.

If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by thirty (30) days after the execution of a waiver of service or thirty (30) days after service is completed, whichever is sooner, e-mail a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, available at https://nvsd.uscomts.gov/node/754 and attached to this order, to OrdersandJudgments@nysd.uscom1s.gov. If the Court approves that form, all further proceedings will then be conducted before the assigned Magistrate Judge rather than before me. An information sheet on proceedings before magistrate judges is also attached to this order. Any appeal would be taken dir ectly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, as it would be if the consent form were not signed and so ordered.

If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by thirty (30) days after the execution of a waiver of service or thirty (30) days after service is completed, whichever is sooner, advising the Com1 that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences.

SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGES REFERRALS AND CONSENTS

All cases in die Soutiiem District of New York are assigned to two judges: a district judge and a magistrate judge. District judges are appointed for life terms by die President. Magistrate judges are selected by a majority vote of the district judges in the particular district and serve terms of eight years.

Referrals to the Magistrate Judge, The district judge assigned to your case may refer the case to a magistrate judge for specific purposes. Commonly, the referral will be for the magistrate judge to conduct die proceedings that occur before trial, such as resolving discovery disputes or presiding over settlement conferences. A referral may also be made for the magistrate fudge to issue to die district judge a report and recommendation on how to resolve a motion, such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment. The consent of the parties is not needed for the district judge to refer the case to the magistrate judge for these purposes. If the district judge has made such a referral, you can ask the district judge to review any magistrate judge's decision by filing an objection with the district judge within fourteen days of that decision. The district judge will rule on any timely objections that you file. If you do not file an objection, you will give up your right to challenge the magistrate judge's decision at a later time, including on appeal. See Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Consent to Proceed Before the Magistrate Judge. If you would like your case to move more quickly, it is helpful to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge for all purposes, including any trial. If you consent, the magistrate fudge will perform the identical function that the district judge would have performed. Any trial in your case would be either a jury or a nonjury trial, depending upon whether there is a right to a jury trial and a proper request for such a trial. The only difference is that the magistrate judge - and not the district judge - would preside over that trial Cases that proceed for all purposes before a magistrate judge generally move more quickly tlian cases before a district fudge. If you consent to proceed before die magistrate judge, the district fudge plays no further role in the case. Any appeal is taken directly to the Court of Appeals. It is your choice whether or not to consent to proceed before the magistrate judge, and all parties must consent nr the case will not proceed before the magistrate judge.

A copy of the appropriate consent form is attached. Additional forms are also available from the Pro Se Intake Unit and on the Court s website.


Summaries of

DE Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. M/V One Apus in rem

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2021
21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

DE Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. M/V One Apus in rem

Case Details

Full title:DE WELL CONTAINER SHIPPING, INC., Plaintiff, v. M/V ONE APUS in rem…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)