From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. M/V One Apus

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2021
21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 9980 (AT)

12-08-2021

DE WELL CONTAINER SHIPPING, INC., Plaintiff, v. M/V ONE APUS in rem. CHIDORI SHIP HOLDING LLC, JESSICA SHIP HOLDING S.A., NYK SHIPMANAGEMENT PTE LTD., OCEAN NETWORK EXPRESS PTE LTD., HAPAG-LLOYD AKTIENGESELLCHAFT, and HMM CO., LTD. f/k/a HYUNDAI MERCHANT MARINE CO., LTD., Defendants.


ORDER

ANALISA TORRES, District Judge.

To protect the public health, while promoting the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding, ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place “before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28” if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

De Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. M/V One Apus

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 8, 2021
21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)
Case details for

De Well Container Shipping, Inc. v. M/V One Apus

Case Details

Full title:DE WELL CONTAINER SHIPPING, INC., Plaintiff, v. M/V ONE APUS in rem…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 8, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 9980 (AT) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2021)