Opinion
17367 Index No. 159720/19 Case No. 2022–02272
02-21-2023
Jose DE PAZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. 4221 BROADWAY OWNER LLC, Defendant–Respondent, Tierra Y. Mar Restaurant, Inc., Defendant.
Mallilo & Grossman, Flushing (Ankesh Sharma of counsel), for appellant. Hickey Smith Dodd LLP, New York (Domenick D'Angelica of counsel), for respondent.
Mallilo & Grossman, Flushing (Ankesh Sharma of counsel), for appellant.
Hickey Smith Dodd LLP, New York (Domenick D'Angelica of counsel), for respondent.
Webber, J.P., Gesmer, Singh, Moulton, Scarpulla, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered on or about April 28, 2022, which granted defendant 4221 Broadway Owner LLC's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for injuries he sustained when he fell down a staircase through open cellar doors outside premises owned by defendant landlord 4221 Broadway and leased to defendant Tierra Y Mar Restaurant.
Defendant 4221 Broadway demonstrated prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As an out-of-possession landlord, 4221 Broadway is generally not liable for negligence based on the condition of the demised premises "unless [it] is either contractually obligated to make repairs and/or maintain the premises or has a contractual right to reenter, inspect and make needed repairs at the tenant's expense and liability is based on a significant structural or design defect that is contrary to a specific statutory safety provision" ( Quing Sui Li v. 37–65 LLC, 114 A.D.3d 538, 539, 981 N.Y.S.2d 14 [1st Dept. 2014] ). The record demonstrates that the accident occurred because Tierra left the cellar doors open, and not because the cellar doors had a structural or design defect. Accordingly, there is no basis upon which to find 4221 Broadway liable for plaintiff's injury (see Harrington v. Azogues Corp., 191 A.D.3d 529, 138 N.Y.S.3d 338 [1st Dept. 2021] ; Matias v. West 16th Realty LLC, 189 A.D.3d 681, 682, 139 N.Y.S.3d 161 [1st Dept. 2020] ).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.