From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

De Nardis v. Stevens Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 24, 1962
184 A.2d 417 (N.J. 1962)

Opinion

Argued September 11, 1962 —

Decided September 24, 1962.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Thomas E. Weinstock argued the cause for the respondent ( Messrs. Bendit Weinstock, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.

Mr. Justice HALL and Mr. Justice HANEMAN vote to reverse the judgment for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of Judge Price.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — Justices HALL and HANEMAN — 2.


Summaries of

De Nardis v. Stevens Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Sep 24, 1962
184 A.2d 417 (N.J. 1962)
Case details for

De Nardis v. Stevens Construction Co.

Case Details

Full title:GIUSEPPE DE NARDIS, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. STEVENS CONSTRUCTION CO.…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Sep 24, 1962

Citations

184 A.2d 417 (N.J. 1962)
184 A.2d 417

Citing Cases

Matter of Fragale v. Armory Maintenance

19; but, see, Larson's discussion on page 12 of his 1965 supplement where he suggests it may not matter where…

Martin v. J. Lichtman Sons

"And see Larson's definition and discussion of `neutral' risks, in § 7.30 of his book, cited and followed in…