Opinion
March Term, 1897.
Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Rumsey, Patterson, O'Brien and Ingraham, JJ.
Judgment modified by reducing the total award to $25,397.63 and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs to either party. —
We do not think, under the rule heretofore established in these cases, that there was evidence to sustain the finding of the referee as to the damages sustained by the Fulton National Bank prior to the time of the conveyance by the bank to the plaintiff. That amount, therefore, must be disallowed, as must the interest allowed on that amount to the date of the report. It also seems that the plaintiff was allowed damages for the period from the 1st day of January, 1890, to the 1st day of May, 1890. The evidence showed that during that time the premises were not occupied, but that the plaintiffs were engaged in making the necessary repairs to make the property comply with the lease which commenced on the 1st day of May, 1890. We think that the amount for those four months, from January first to May first, should also be disallowed. The amount, therefore, that will be disallowed is the sum of $3,808.30, allowed as damages sustained by the Fulton National Bank; $1,631.86 interest on such damages to date of report, and $433.33, being the amount of damages awarded to the plaintiffs as having accrued between January 1, 1890, and May 1, 1890, aggregating $5,873,49, which, deducted from the total recovery, leaves a balance due to the plaintiffs of $25,397.63. We think that the amount awarded by the referee with this exception was moderate, and was amply sustained by the evidence. No question of law is presented upon the appeal which requires examination. The judgment is, therefore, modified by reducing the total award to $25,397.63; and as thus modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.