Opinion
No. 3D19-2257
01-20-2021
Giuliana Gomez DE CORDOVA n/k/a Giuliana Llanso, Appellant, v. Jose Gomez DE CORDOVA, Appellee.
Cruz Legal, P.A., and Marisol Cruz ; Martinez-Scanziani & Associates Law, P.A. and Denise Martinez-Scanziani, for appellant. Valdespino & Associates, P.A., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, for appellee.
Cruz Legal, P.A., and Marisol Cruz ; Martinez-Scanziani & Associates Law, P.A. and Denise Martinez-Scanziani, for appellant.
Valdespino & Associates, P.A., and Jacqueline M. Valdespino, for appellee.
Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Llanso v. Gomez de Cordova, 263 So. 3d 137, 140-41 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (noting that "[o]ur reversal, however, is without prejudice to the trial court's re-entry of a similar final judgment and subsequent orders as the interlocutory appeal has been dismissed"); see also Cadwell v. Cadwell, 549 So. 2d 1133, 1135 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (explaining that a final judgment may be reentered on remand "as the trial court deems appropriate"); Garcia-Lawson v. Lawson, 82 So. 3d 137, 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) ("We note that, on remand, the trial court is authorized to re-enter the final judgment since the interlocutory appeals that prevented that court from disposing of the case have been resolved with finality.").
Both appellant and appellee move for appellate attorney's fees. Pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997), we remand both motions for appellate attorney's fees to the trial court for further proceedings thereon.