From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Day

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 11, 1995
895 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. WD 49591.

April 11, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, MACON COUNTY; JAMES N. FOLEY, JUDGE.

Cynthia A. Suter, Moberly, for appellant.

David A. Masters, Macon, for respondent.

Before SPINDEN, P.J., and ULRICH and SMART, JJ.


ORDER


Billy Don Day appeals from an order modifying a decree of dissolution. He contends the trial court erred in calculating child support and ordering payment of a portion of his daughter's college expenses. He also contends the court erred in ordering him to continue to provide health insurance coverage for the children and to pay the deductibles. Among other things, he contends that the departure from the Form 14 calculation violated Rule 88.01 in that the court did not specifically use the word "unjust" or "inappropriate" in its findings. Finally, he contends the court erred in the award of attorney's fees to Mary Ellen Day.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Day v. Day

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Apr 11, 1995
895 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Day v. Day

Case Details

Full title:BILLY DON DAY, APPELLANT, v. MARY ELLEN DAY (FARNHAM), RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Apr 11, 1995

Citations

895 S.W.2d 676 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)