Day v. Bond

1 Analyses of this case by attorneys

  1. Uncovering Kris Kobach’s Anti-Voting History

    Brennan Center for JusticeTomas LopezMay 13, 2017

    See http://www.omaha.com/news/metro/catch--keeps-fremont-from-acting-on-controversial-housing-ordinance/article_34091da3-ddd3-5643-8076-f474fd328260.html.[13] See Villas at Parkside Partners v. City of Farmers Branch, 726 F.3d 524 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc) (federal appeals court decision invalidating Kobach-authored ordinance concerning housing for undocumented immigrants, for which Kobach led legal defense).[14]http://www.irli.org/legal-team (listing Kobach as “Of Counsel”)[15] See Martinez v. Regents of the University of California, 50 241 P.3d 855 (Cal. 2010) (California Supreme Court decision rejecting challenge to California statute counting certain non-citizens as residents for tuition purposes, to which Kobach led challenge); Day v. Bond, 500 F.3d 1127 (10th Cir. 2007) (Federal appeals court ruling rejecting challenge to Kansas law counting certain non-citizens as residents for tuition purposes, to which Kobach led challenge). For further information on the California lawsuit and decision, see http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/sdut-court-upholds-in-state-tuition-for-some-immigrants-2010nov15-story.html.