From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Day v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 18, 2013
CIVIL No. 1:12-CV-141-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL No. 1:12-CV-141-DBH

01-18-2013

GEORGE R. DAY, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 30, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2013, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore O RDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby A DOPTED. The decision of the Commissioner is V ACATED and the case is R EMANDED for proceedings not inconsistent with the Recommended Decision.

S O O RDERED.

_________________

D. BROCK HORNBY

U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT J UDGE


Summaries of

Day v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 18, 2013
CIVIL No. 1:12-CV-141-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Day v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE R. DAY, PLAINTIFF v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

CIVIL No. 1:12-CV-141-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 18, 2013)

Citing Cases

Michael H. v. Soc. Sec. Admin. Comm'r

An exception to the Chenery rule exists when a remand will amount to no more than an empty exercise because,…

Amanda I. v. Kijakazi

Plaintiff contends that Defendant's argument fails because “a reviewing court cannot affirm an agency's…