Dawson v. GM Fin.

Full title: CHELSEA DAWSON, PLAINTIFF v. GM FINANCIAL DEFENDANT

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 11, 2023

4:22-cv-1277-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 11, 2023)

Opinion

4:22-cv-1277-DPM

01-11-2023

CHELSEA DAWSON, PLAINTIFF v. GM FINANCIAL DEFENDANT

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge

1. Dawson's motion to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. 1, is denied because it is incomplete. She lists an employer but fails to indicate her wages. She also doesn't list monthly expenses or whether she has dependents.

2. Dawson must submit a completed application by 31 January 2023. If she doesn't, then the Court will dismiss her complaint without prejudice. Local Rule 5.5(c)(2).

3. The Court directs the Clerk to mail Dawson an in forma pauperis application with a copy of this Order.

So Ordered.