From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawson v. Cartledge

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 20, 2016
631 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-7420

01-20-2016

WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN LARRY CARTLEDGE, in his individual capacity; ASSOCIATE WARDEN FLORENCE MAUNEY, in her individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees.

William Douglas Dawson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:14-cv-03259-DCN) Before AGEE, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Douglas Dawson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Cornwell Holler, LEE ERTER WILSON HOLLER & SMITH, LLC, Sumter, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Douglas Dawson, Jr., appeals the district court's order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Dawson v. Cartledge, No. 4:14-cv-03259-DCN (D.S.C. Aug. 28, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Dawson v. Cartledge

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 20, 2016
631 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Dawson v. Cartledge

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM DOUGLAS DAWSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN LARRY…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 20, 2016

Citations

631 F. App'x 145 (4th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Pleasant v. Breckon

Pleasant filed a Rule 60(b) motion on August 1, 2014 and the court denied it. United States v. Pleasant, No.…

Kinard v. McCall

, minimal due process is required.” Dawson v. Cartledge, No. 4:14-cv-3259-DCN, 2015 WL 5092617, at *4 (D.S.C.…