From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dawes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 22, 1997
687 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

CASE NO. 96-03669

Opinion filed January 22, 1997.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(g) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Oliver L. Green, Jr., Judge.


Joseph B. Dawes seeks review of the denial of his motion to correct sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Because the trial court's order fails to conclusively refute Dawes' claim for credit for time previously served, we reverse.

Dawes alleges that he did not receive full credit for the ten-year prison sentence he completed in 1991, after the trial court revoked his probation for crimes committed in 1985, 1986, and 1988, and sentenced him to three concurrent twelve-year prison sentences. Because Dawes' crimes were committed before October 1, 1989, he is entitled to gain time granted during the service of the initial concurrent sentences pursuant to section 944.275, Florida Statutes (1989), as well as actual time served. Cook v. State, 645 So.2d 436, 438, n. 6 (Fla. 1994).

Although the trial court may delegate to the Department of Corrections (DOC) the responsibility to determine the number of days to be credited, it is the court's responsibility to decide a defendant's entitlement to prison credit for any such unforfeited gain time. Belcher v. State, 21 Fla. L. Weekly D1398 (Fla. 2d DCA June 12, 1996). If the trial court's sentencing order allows credit for all time previously served, DOC must include credit for unforfeited gain time. Forbes v. Singletary, 21 Fla. L. Weekly S481 (Fla. Oct. 31, 1996).

We reverse because the trial court did not attach portions of the record conclusively showing that Dawes is entitled to no relief. On remand, if the trial court denies the motion again, it shall attach those documents, including the judgment and sentence, that conclusively refute the claim that Dawes was not awarded credit for all time previously served in prison. If the sentencing order does not award prison credit, Dawes shall be resentenced in a manner that effectuates the intent of the plea agreement. Dawes must seek appellate review of the trial court's order within thirty days of its rendition.

Reversed and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Dawes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 22, 1997
687 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Dawes v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. DAWES, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 22, 1997

Citations

687 So. 2d 870 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. State

Burglary is a specific intent crime for which voluntary intoxication is a defense. Whitty v. State, 687 So.2d…