From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Westchester Cnty.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 28, 2021
20 Civ. 517 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 517 (NSR)

09-28-2021

MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

NELSON S. ROMÁN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By Order dated August 12, 2021, the Court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss, dismissing Plaintiffs claims without prejudice and stating that “[i]f an amended pleading is not made by September 6, 2021 and Plaintiff fails to move for an extension to that deadline, the claims dismissed without prejudice herein may be dismissed with prejudice and the action terminated without further notice.” (Id.) No amended pleading has been filed. On September 24, 2021 Defendants asked the Court to dismiss the claims against them with prejudice and to terminate this action. (ECF No. 37.)

Plaintiff filed his complaint pro se (ECF Nos. 1, 2), but retained counsel in July 2020, after the Defendants were served (ECF No. 22). Accordingly, Plaintiff opposed Defendants' motion to dismiss through counsel. (ECF Nos. 30 and 31.)

Therefore, the claims previously dismissed without prejudice are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Westchester Cnty.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 28, 2021
20 Civ. 517 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. Westchester Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. WESTCHESTER COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 28, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 517 (NSR) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 28, 2021)