From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 22, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-cv-01348-CMA-NYW (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 20-cv-01348-CMA-NYW

10-22-2020

ELEKE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING AND AFFIRMING SEPTEMBER 28, 2020 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Defendant United States of America's Motion for Administrative Closure or Stay (Doc. # 28) referred to Magistrate Judge Wang on August 29, 2020. Magistrate Judge Wang issued a Recommendation on September 28, 2020 (Doc. # 44) recommending that this case be administratively closed pending the conclusion of the Plaintiff's criminal investigation. (See Recommendation at 13.) The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were due within 14 days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (Recommendation at 13.) Despite this advisement, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation were filed by either party.

"In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate. . . [judge's] report under any standard it deems appropriate." Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating
that "[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings").

Applying this standard, I am satisfied that the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wang is sound and that there is no clear error on the face of the record. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang (Doc. # 44) filed September 28, 2020, is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.

In accordance therewith, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Administrative Closure or Stay (Doc. # 28) is GRANTED and this case is ADMINSTRATIVELY CLOSED pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall, within 90 days of the date of this Order, a status report on the current status of any criminal proceedings relating to the facts alleged in Plaintiff's Complaint, and continue to file a status report every 90 days thereafter until such time as the Plaintiff's criminal case has been resolved and the parties have filed a request to reopen this case.

DATED: October 22, 2020

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 22, 2020
Civil Action No. 20-cv-01348-CMA-NYW (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2020)
Case details for

Davis v. United States

Case Details

Full title:ELEKE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 22, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 20-cv-01348-CMA-NYW (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2020)

Citing Cases

Estate of McClain v. City of Aurora

Courts in this District typically consider six factors when determining whether to stay a case in light of…