Opinion
Civil Action 3:22-CV-133-SA-JMV
01-03-2023
ALICIA DAWN DAVIS, PLAINTIFF v. TARGET CORPORATION, et al., DEFENDANTS
ORDER
SHARION AYCOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On December 15, 2022, Magistrate Judge Virden entered a Report and Recommendation [8]. The Report and Recommendation [8] explains the procedural history of this case and ultimately concludes that the case should “be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to timely prosecute.” [8] at p. 2. The Report and Recommendation [8] then specifically advised the Plaintiff as to the appropriate procedure to filing any objections. Although the time to file an objection has expired, no objection has been filed.
“With respect to those portions of the report and recommendation to which no objections were raised, the Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record.” Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation [8] and the record as a whole, the Court finds that there is no plain error. The Court ADOPTS IN FULL the Report and Recommendation [8]. The Plaintiff's claims are hereby dismissed without prejudice. This CASE is CLOSED.
SO ORDERED.