From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Sunoco Pipeline Ltd.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 27, 2021
957 N.W.2d 780 (Mich. 2021)

Opinion

SC: 161751 COA: 346729

04-27-2021

Venessa DAVIS, John Davis, Ronald W. Radatz, Neil J. Hamann, Jacqueline A. Hamann, Dennis J. Hamann, Joseph Sharpe, Jr., Michelle Sharpe, John A. Eschenberg, II, Leah Eschenberg, Terry Merchant, Teresa Merchant, Charles Coggins, II, Kimberly Coggins, and Charles Coggins, III, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SUNOCO PIPELINE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and Sunoco Logistics Partners Operations GP, LLC, Defendants-Appellants, and Enbridge Energy Limited Partnership, Enbridge Pipelines Lakehead, LLC, Enbridge Pipelines Toledo, Inc., Great Lakes Petroleum Corporation, Great Lake Petroleum Company, and Great Lakes Petroleum Transportation, LLC, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Davis v. Sunoco Pipeline Ltd.

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 27, 2021
957 N.W.2d 780 (Mich. 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. Sunoco Pipeline Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:VENESSA DAVIS, JOHN DAVIS, RONALD W. RADATZ, NEIL J. HAMANN, JACQUELINE A…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 27, 2021

Citations

957 N.W.2d 780 (Mich. 2021)