From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 5, 2000
758 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

explaining that prejudgment civil contempt orders are more properly reviewed by certiorari

Summary of this case from Caruso v. Super Vision Intl

Opinion

No. 2d 99-548.

Opinion filed May 5, 2000.

Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Richard A. Luce, Judge.

John Thor White, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jenny S. Sieg, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Merlan Davis has filed an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's order holding him in civil contempt. This court has held that prejudgment civil contempt orders are more properly reviewed by certiorari. See Knorr v. Knorr, 751 So.2d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Accordingly, this appeal is treated as a petition for writ of certiorari which is denied.

Petition for writ of certiorari denied.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and BLUE, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 5, 2000
758 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

explaining that prejudgment civil contempt orders are more properly reviewed by certiorari

Summary of this case from Caruso v. Super Vision Intl
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:MERLAN DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 5, 2000

Citations

758 So. 2d 724 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Caruso v. Super Vision Intl

The record establishes that the trial court's orders are not appealable under rule 9.130. See Davis v. State,…