Opinion
WD 84835
10-25-2022
Zachary Robert DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
Richard H. Sindel, St. Louis, for Appellant. Zeb Charlton, for Respondent.
Richard H. Sindel, St. Louis, for Appellant.
Zeb Charlton, for Respondent.
Division One: W. Douglas Thomson, Presiding Judge, Alok Ahuja, Judge and Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Zachary Robert Davis ("Davis") appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Davis argues the motion court erred because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file motions to suppress evidence or object to evidence obtained from the console of his vehicle and evidence obtained from his cell phone. We affirm. A published opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum that sets forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).