From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 14, 2018
259 So. 3d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

No. 1D17-4951

12-14-2018

Abraham DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender; Steven Seliger and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Andy Thomas, Public Defender; Steven Seliger and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defenders, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct two scrivener's errors in the order of revocation. The order of revocation states Appellant committed two violations of condition 5. It should state that he violated conditions 9 and 32. The order of revocation also erroneously states that he "admitted to the violation allegations contained in the affidavit of violation." Instead, it should reflect that Appellant was tried and found guilty of violating probation.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.

Lewis, Wetherell, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Dec 14, 2018
259 So. 3d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Dec 14, 2018

Citations

259 So. 3d 313 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Citing Cases

Anglin v. State

The order of revocation should therefore be corrected to reflect that Mr. Anglin was found to have violated…