From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Feb 24, 2011
373 P.3d 908 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57760.

02-24-2011

Kevin Scott DAVIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Kevin Scott Davis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney


Kevin Scott Davis

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a proper person petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition. Petitioner challenges his judgment of conviction and asserts he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.170 ; NRS 34.330. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b) ; NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.

ORDER the petition DENIED.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Feb 24, 2011
373 P.3d 908 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kevin Scott DAVIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Feb 24, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 908 (Nev. 2011)