From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Aug 19, 2014
NO. 14-14-00456-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 19, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 14-14-00456-CR

08-19-2014

ASHTON CHARLES DAVIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 230th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1390553

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion to suppress. Because this court lacks jurisdiction, we order the appeal dismissed.

Generally, an appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The record before this court contains no judgment or sentence of the trial court. The trial court's order is therefore interlocutory in nature. The denial of a defendant's motion to suppress is not a separately appealable order. See McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison and Donovan. Do Not Publish - Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).


Summaries of

Davis v. State

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Aug 19, 2014
NO. 14-14-00456-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 19, 2014)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:ASHTON CHARLES DAVIS, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 19, 2014

Citations

NO. 14-14-00456-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 19, 2014)

Citing Cases

State v. Sanchez

Our review in this case is limited to whether the trial court's ruling granting the motion to suppress the…

Peavy v. State

No such grant exists for an interlocutory appeal of an order denying a defendant's pretrial motion to…