From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 28, 2012
95 So. 3d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D11–2394.

2012-08-28

James E. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

A case of Original Jurisdiction–Mandamus. James E. Davis, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


A case of Original Jurisdiction–Mandamus.
James E. Davis, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Richard L. Polin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Before WELLS, C.J., and SUAREZ and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Following review of the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, it is ordered that said petition is denied as moot, as the trial court entered written orders that fully address the petitioner's 1999 motion and amended 2001 motion.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus denied.


Summaries of

Davis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 28, 2012
95 So. 3d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. State

Case Details

Full title:James E. DAVIS, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Aug 28, 2012

Citations

95 So. 3d 396 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

inefficient assistance of counsel, which was per curiam affirmed by this Court on March 30, 2016. Davis has…