From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-0582 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0582 DAD P

01-31-2013

JON GREGORY DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. JERRY W. SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, the only party to appear in this action, has consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Doc. No. 7.

By order filed December 11, 2012, plaintiff's amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days from the date of this order plaintiff shall show cause in writing, if any he has, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Failure to respond to this order will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.

______________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Smith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-0582 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

Davis v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:JON GREGORY DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. JERRY W. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0582 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)