From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Saul

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Aug 17, 2021
No. 20CV814-BLM (S.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)

Opinion

20CV814-BLM

08-17-2021

TONIA SUZETTE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(D)

[ECF NO. 24]

Hon. Barbara L. Major, United States Magistrate Judge

On April 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendant Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, seeking judicial review of the denial of her applications for “disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income.” ECF No. 1.

On June 7, 2021, the Court issued an Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Remanding for Further Proceedings. ECF No. 23.

On August 12, 2021, the parties filed a Joint Motion for the Award and Payment of Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) and Costs Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. ECF No. 24. The parties stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney's fees and expenses in the amount of $4, 700.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. 2412(d). Id.

The EAJA allows a prevailing party to seek attorney's fees from the United States within thirty days of final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). “A sentence four remand becomes a final judgment, for purposes of attorneys' fees claims brought pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon expiration of the time for appeal.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854 (9th Cir. 2002). If one of the parties is the United States, either party may file a notice of appeal within sixty days of the order appealed from. See Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1)(B). “A plaintiff who obtains a sentence four remand is considered a prevailing party for attorneys' fees.” Akopyan, 296 F.3d at 854. Therefore, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this action for purposes of attorney's fees, the parties' joint motion is timely, and the Court finds the stipulated amount of fees and expenses reasonable.

Having considered the joint motion and finding the stipulated amount of fees and expenses reasonable, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and AWARDS Plaintiff attorney's fees and expenses in the total amount of $4, 700.00, subject to the terms of the parties' joint motion [see ECF No. 24]. Fees will be made payable to Tonia Suzette Davis, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Tonia Suzette Davis does not owe a federal debt, then the government will cause the payment of fees, expenses, and costs to be made directly to the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, pursuant to the assignment executed by Tonia Suzette Davis. Any payments will be delivered to Steven G. Rosales.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Saul

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Aug 17, 2021
No. 20CV814-BLM (S.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:TONIA SUZETTE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Aug 17, 2021

Citations

No. 20CV814-BLM (S.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2021)