From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Tr. 2005-3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 10, 2016
Case No. 16-10831 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 10, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-10831

08-10-2016

Shaunton Davis, Plaintiff, v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3, a Deleware Statutory Trust, and Shermeta Law Group, P.C., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF No. 12)

This Court referred this action to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford to resolve all pretrial matters, except dispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). On June 13, 2016, Magistrate Judge Stafford entered an order requiring Davis to show cause in writing as to whether she properly served Defendant National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 ("the Trust"). The Court gave Davis additional time, but Davis failed to properly complete service and did not respond to the show cause order. On July 12, 2016, Magistrate Judge Stafford submitted a report and recommendation (R&R) recommending Defendant National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 be dismissed without prejudice.

Neither party filed objections within the time frame provided for in 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich. LR 72.1(d).

A United States District Court Judge may refer certain dispositive pretrial motions to a United States Magistrate Judge for submission of proposed findings of fact and a recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). This Court may accept, reject, or modify in whole or in part, the proposed findings and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(C). The Court makes a de novo determination of any portion of the R&R to which objection is made. Id. The statute does not require review, by either the district court or the court of appeals, of any issue that is not the subject of an objection. See, Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). "[W]hile the statute does not require the [district] judge to review an issue de novo if no objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard." Id. at 154. The district court judge retains "the ultimate authority to issue an appropriate order." Id. at 153.

Magistrate Judge Stafford thoroughly lays out the facts in her R&R. She also applies relevant case law and gives well reasoned explanations for her conclusions.

The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R. Defendant National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-3 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS ORDERED.

S/Victoria A. Roberts

Victoria A. Roberts

United States District Judge Dated: August 10, 2016 The undersigned certifies that a copy of this document was served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on August 10, 2016. s/Linda Vertriest
Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Davis v. Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Tr. 2005-3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Aug 10, 2016
Case No. 16-10831 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 10, 2016)
Case details for

Davis v. Nat'l Collegiate Student Loan Tr. 2005-3

Case Details

Full title:Shaunton Davis, Plaintiff, v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 10, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-10831 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 10, 2016)

Citing Cases

Island Jay, Inc. v. MyLocker.Com, L.L.C.

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(A)(ii). MyLocker points to cases where there was “no indication that [defendant's]…