From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Middletown Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-83 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:13-cv-83

03-05-2013

Robare D. Davis, Plaintiff v. Middletown Police Department, et al., Defendants


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed February 8, 2013 (Doc. 4).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

This Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).

___________

Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Davis v. Middletown Police Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2013
Case No. 1:13-cv-83 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Davis v. Middletown Police Dep't

Case Details

Full title:Robare D. Davis, Plaintiff v. Middletown Police Department, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:13-cv-83 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2013)