From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Metro N. Commuter R.R.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
21 Civ. 387 (ER) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 387 (ER) (BCM)

12-10-2021

RHULAND DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. METRO NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD, ANDREW PAUL, and JOHN LONGOBARDI Defendants.


ORDER

EDGARDO RAMOS, U.S.D.J.

Please be advised that this case has been reassigned to the Honorable Edgardo Ramos. Upon review of the docket, the Court believes it is appropriate to deny Defendants' first motion to dismiss, Doc. 16, as moot following the filing of the first amended complaint, Doc. 22. If either party has a different view, you are directed to respond by Wednesday, December 15, 2021. Otherwise, the first motion will be dismissed.

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Metro N. Commuter R.R.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 10, 2021
21 Civ. 387 (ER) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Davis v. Metro N. Commuter R.R.

Case Details

Full title:RHULAND DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. METRO NORTH COMMUTER RAILROAD, ANDREW PAUL…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 10, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 387 (ER) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 10, 2021)