From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Aug 12, 2008
Case No.: 3:07cv49/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 12, 2008)

Opinion

Case No.: 3:07cv49/LAC/EMT.

August 12, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated June 4, 2008. The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 10) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Aug 12, 2008
Case No.: 3:07cv49/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 12, 2008)
Case details for

Davis v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. DAVIS, III, Petitioner, v. WALTER A. McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Aug 12, 2008

Citations

Case No.: 3:07cv49/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Aug. 12, 2008)