From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Lay

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 3, 2023
2:20-cv-00147 JM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00147 JM

01-03-2023

RICHARD ALAN DAVIS ADC #89568 PLAINTIFF v. GAYLON LAY, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 76) filed by Plaintiff Richard Alan Davis is denied, and the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 93) filed by defendants Gaylon Lay, Emmer Branch, and James Dycus is granted. Davis' remaining claims against Lay, Branch, and Dycus are dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Davis v. Lay

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jan 3, 2023
2:20-cv-00147 JM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Davis v. Lay

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALAN DAVIS ADC #89568 PLAINTIFF v. GAYLON LAY, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jan 3, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-00147 JM (E.D. Ark. Jan. 3, 2023)