From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Law

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jul 29, 2013
2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2013)

Opinion

          KATHLEEN MARY KUSHI CARTER #157790, TAMARA M. HEATHCOTE #193312, Irvine, California, Attorneys for Defendant HOLLINS LAW.


          ORDER

          LAWRENCE K. KARTON, District Judge.

          [Filed concurrently with Request for Leave to File a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Further Responses to Hollins Law's Discovery Requests and Deposition Questions; Or in the Alternative, Request for Modification of the Pretrial Schheduling Order; Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Declaration of Tamara M. Heathcote in Support Thereof]

         Having considered Hollins Law's Request for Leave to File a Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Further Responses of Hollins Law's Discovery Requests and Deposition Questions, or in the alternative, Request for Modification of the Pretrial Scheduling Order.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:


Summaries of

Davis v. Law

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Jul 29, 2013
2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Davis v. Law

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. HOLLINS LAW, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Jul 29, 2013

Citations

2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 29, 2013)