From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 26, 1919
82 So. 529 (Ala. 1919)

Opinion

3 Div. 396.

June 26, 1919.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.

W. A. Jordan, of Montgomery, for appellants.

Hill, Hill, Whiting Thomas, of Montgomery, for appellee.


We think the decree of the circuit court is based upon a correct construction of the will in question. Tilley, as Guardian, v. Letcher, Adm'x, 82 So. 527; Hinson v. Williamson, 74 Ala. 180; Boland v. Tiernay, 118 Iowa, 59, 64, 91 N.W. 836; Scholl v. Olmstead, 84 Ga. 693, 11 S.E. 541; Mullanny v. Nangle, 212 Ill. 247, 72 N.E. 385.

Ante, p. 277.

The right to execute a personal trust, not being attached to the office of executor, though vested in the person so named, is not dependent upon that office, and is not lost by the donee's discharge as executor.

Inasmuch as the exercise of the discretionary power granted by item 5 of the will, viz., to sell the property devised to Mrs. Lasseter for reinvestment, is dependent upon a prior division of the estate, as directed in item 3, it is clear that, if a division is not otherwise effected by the devisees, the trustee, Lambert, would be authorized to institute proceedings in a proper forum for that purpose.

Let the decree of the circuit court be affirmed, with the addendum just above noted.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Davis v. Lambert

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 26, 1919
82 So. 529 (Ala. 1919)
Case details for

Davis v. Lambert

Case Details

Full title:DAVIS et al. v. LAMBERT

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 26, 1919

Citations

82 So. 529 (Ala. 1919)
82 So. 529

Citing Cases

Jones v. Glenn

Denson Denson, of Opelika, for appellants. Powers given in and by a will to executor continue so long as…

Badham v. Badham

The offices of executor and trustee under the same will are separate and distinct capacities and entities.…