From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Kmart Holding Company

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Oct 7, 2005
Case No. C04-0632-WDB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C04-0632-WDB.

October 7, 2005

HOWARD MOORE, JR., Moore and Moore, Oakland, California, Attorney for Plaintiff, JOCELYN DAVIS.

Steven R. Blackburn, Lori Bien, SBN Epstein Becker Green, P.C., San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant, KMART HOLDING COMPANY.


STIPULATION TO DISMISS CIVIL ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER THEREON [Rule 41, FRCP]


Notice is hereby given that the parties to the above-entitled civil action through their counsel of record hereby stipulate to entry of an immediate order dismissing this civil action in its entirety with prejudice.

ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION TO DISMISS CIVIL ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [Rule 41, FRCP]

Pursuant to Stipulation:

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice and hereby closed and removed from the active calendar of this Court.


Summaries of

Davis v. Kmart Holding Company

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Oct 7, 2005
Case No. C04-0632-WDB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2005)
Case details for

Davis v. Kmart Holding Company

Case Details

Full title:JOYCELYN DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. KMART HOLDING COMPANY, a corporation dba…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Oct 7, 2005

Citations

Case No. C04-0632-WDB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2005)