From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Hunt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 28, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-170

06-28-2013

WILLIE L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH S. HUNT, Defendant.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #4), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief would be granted. The Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that any appeal would be objectively frivolous, barring Plaintiff from appealing in forma pauperis

___________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. Hunt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Jun 28, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Davis v. Hunt

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE L. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. DEBORAH S. HUNT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Jun 28, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-170 (S.D. Ohio Jun. 28, 2013)