From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Hollins Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Feb 8, 2013
CASE NO: 2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO: 2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH

02-08-2013

MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. HOLLINS LAW, Defendant.

Attorney for Plaintiff, MICHAEL DAVIS Jessica L. Pascale, Esq. Krohn & Moss, Ltd.


HON. LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

DEPT COURTROOM 4


ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF HEARING RE DEFENDANT'S

MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS


COMPLAINT FILED: December 28, 2012

Having considered the Stipulation for Continuance of Hearing Date agreed to by counsel for the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the hearing on the pending motion by Defendant Hollins Law to Dismiss the Second Count and Strike the Second Count of Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby continued until Monday, March 11, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4 of the above captioned Court, and it is further

ORDERED that an Opposition shall be field by February 25, 2013, and a Reply shall be filed by March 4, 2013.

By

______________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

PROOF OF SERVICE

(1013A(3) Code Civ. Proc. Revised 5/1/88)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE

I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is Century Centre, 2601 Main Street, Penthouse Suite 1300, Irvine, California 92614-4239.

On February 7, 2013, I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED] ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF HEARING RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND MOTION TO DISMISS on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as stated on the attached mailing list. [ ] by overnight delivery via Federal Express pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1013. [ ] by FAX. I faxed said document pursuant to Rules of Court rule 2.306, on ___________, at approximately ___________ from my facsimile telephone number 714.558.9091.

The document was transmitted by facsimile transmission and the transmission was reported as complete and without error. The transmission report was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. A copy of the transmission report is attached to this proof of service. [ ] by personal delivery to: [ ] by mail as follows: I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Irvine, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. [×] caused such document to be served on this date by electronic transmission via ECF E-Filing in accordance with standard procedures and to the e-mail address listed on the attached service list. [ ] (STATE) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. [×] (FEDERAL) I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made.

Executed on February 7, 2013, at Irvine, California.

______________________

TAMMY CORTEZ

MAILING LIST

Attorney for Plaintiff, MICHAEL DAVIS Jessica L. Pascale, Esq.
Krohn & Moss, Ltd.


Summaries of

Davis v. Hollins Law

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Feb 8, 2013
CASE NO: 2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)
Case details for

Davis v. Hollins Law

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. HOLLINS LAW, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO

Date published: Feb 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO: 2:12-CV-03107-LKK-GGH (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2013)