From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
NO. 5:12CV00371-BSM-BD (E.D. Ark. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 5:12CV00371-BSM-BD

10-15-2012

RICHARD ALAN DAVIS ADC #89568 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction et al DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended partial disposition submitted by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere, along with the objections filed by Mr. Davis, have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and partial recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Mr. Davis's claims against defendants Hazel Robinson and Larry May are dismissed without prejudice. Robinson and May are dismissed as party defendants.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
NO. 5:12CV00371-BSM-BD (E.D. Ark. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD ALAN DAVIS ADC #89568 PLAINTIFF v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

NO. 5:12CV00371-BSM-BD (E.D. Ark. Oct. 15, 2012)