From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Hart

Supreme Court of California
Aug 13, 1894
103 Cal. 530 (Cal. 1894)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County, and from an order denying a new trial.

         COUNSEL:

         E. Rousseau, and J. A. Haralson, for Appellant.

          Mahon & Laird, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Fitzgerald, J. McFarland, J., and De Haven, J., concurred.

         OPINION

          FITZGERALD, Judge

         There is no brief on file by respondent, nor was the case orally argued in his behalf.

         As the record shows that the findings are attacked by the specifications on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support them, it follows on the authority of Richter v. Fresno Canal etc. Co ., 101 Cal. 582, that the judgment and order appealed from should be reversed.

         So ordered.


Summaries of

Davis v. Hart

Supreme Court of California
Aug 13, 1894
103 Cal. 530 (Cal. 1894)
Case details for

Davis v. Hart

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED A. DAVIS, Respondent, v. JOSIAH H. HART, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 13, 1894

Citations

103 Cal. 530 (Cal. 1894)
37 P. 486

Citing Cases

Lutz v. Merchants Nat. Bank

The matter is now submitted for decision upon the brief of the appellant and the typewritten transcript,…

Kelly v. Bradbury

         It appears from the record that the verdict of the jury is assailed by the specifications, on the…