From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 15, 2010
Civil No. 09-2563 (JNE/FLN) (D. Minn. Nov. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-2563 (JNE/FLN).

November 15, 2010


ORDER


Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment is scheduled to be heard on December 16, 2010. On November 10, 2010, Plaintiff filed an Objection to and Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(f). Under Rule 12(f), "[t]he court may strike from a pleading an insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f). A motion for summary judgment is not a pleading, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a), and a motion to strike is not an appropriate method for challenging a summary judgment motion. Cf. Polite v. Dougherty Cnty. Sch. Sys., 314 F. App'x 180, 184 n. 7 (11th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the Court denies Plaintiff's motion to strike.

Based on the files, records, and proceedings herein, and for the reasons stated above, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment [Docket No. 32] is DENIED.

Dated: November 15, 2010


Summaries of

Davis v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Nov 15, 2010
Civil No. 09-2563 (JNE/FLN) (D. Minn. Nov. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Davis v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Larry M. Davis, Plaintiff, v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Nov 15, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-2563 (JNE/FLN) (D. Minn. Nov. 15, 2010)