From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

92437

Decided and Entered: February 27, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Antwan Davis, Pine City, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Nancy A. Spiegel of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting fighting, violent conduct and creating a disturbance. Included in the evidence presented at his disciplinary hearing were the misbehavior report and the testimony of the reporting correction officer who stated that he had observed petitioner taking an active part in a fight that took place in the prison yard. We find this sufficient to constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Proctor v. Goord, 290 A.D.2d 801).

We reject petitioner's argument that the absence of a correction officer's signature from his copy of the misbehavior report renders it defective. The reporting officer gave a sufficient explanation for the missing signature in his hearing testimony (see Matter of Primo v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 602) and petitioner has, in any event, failed to show that his defense was prejudiced by this technical error (see Matter of McCoy v. Goord, 277 A.D.2d 525, 526). We also find that the misbehavior report was sufficiently detailed to enable petitioner to prepare a defense despite the absence of the names of the other inmates involved in the incident (see Matter of Couch v. Goord, 255 A.D.2d 720). The remaining contentions raised herein, including petitioner's allegation of hearing officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Davis v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Davis v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTWAN DAVIS, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 27, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 836 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 605

Citing Cases

Van Gorder v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

Absent a showing that substantial prejudice resulted from the delay, the regulatory time limits are construed…

Todd v. Annucci

Petitioner's denial that he was involved in the fighting created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer…