From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Gallatin Police Department

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Oct 19, 2010
NO. 3:09-0842 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2010)

Opinion

NO. 3:09-0842.

October 19, 2010


ORDER


Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 62), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Defendant Sircy's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Subsequent Letters (Docket No. 47) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Docket No. 42) and DENIED as to Plaintiff's letters (Docket Nos. 43-44).

The record indicates that service of the Report and Recommendation upon the Plaintiff was returned as "undeliverable as addressed, unable to forward." Docket No. 66. Plaintiff has an obligation to keep the Court advised of his current address. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Gallatin Police Department

United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division
Oct 19, 2010
NO. 3:09-0842 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Davis v. Gallatin Police Department

Case Details

Full title:RICKY LEE DAVIS v. GALLATIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Tennessee, Nashville Division

Date published: Oct 19, 2010

Citations

NO. 3:09-0842 (M.D. Tenn. Oct. 19, 2010)

Citing Cases

Cooler Ink Sols., Inc. v. Blue Ocean Holdings, Inc.

And when Defendants' address changed, they had an affirmative duty to give the Court notice of that change.…