From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Evans

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 3, 2009
CV 08-6636-GW(E) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009)

Opinion


ANTOINE LAPOLEON DAVIS, Petitioner, v. MIKE S. EVANS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 08-6636-GW(E) United States District Court, C.D. California. August 3, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

         IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Petitioner's "Motion to Hold in Abeyance" is denied; and (2) the Petition is dismissed without prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Davis v. Evans

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Aug 3, 2009
CV 08-6636-GW(E) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009)
Case details for

Davis v. Evans

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINE LAPOLEON DAVIS, Petitioner, v. MIKE S. EVANS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2009

Citations

CV 08-6636-GW(E) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009)

Citing Cases

Trujillo v. Stainer

Thus, the mere act of sending a procedurally defective set of claims to the California Supreme Court does…

Romero v. Pollard

Other district courts have reached the same conclusion. See Solis v. Beard, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90694 at…