From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Comcast Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2016
No. 16-1097 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2016)

Summary

affirming consolidated appeals

Summary of this case from Davis v. Bates

Opinion

No. 16-1097 No. 16-1169

06-23-2016

DARLENE J. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, INC.; JOE MINOR; DAN SIMSON, Defendants - Appellees, and DAN THOMAS; RICO WADE, Defendants.

Darlene J. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy McCormack, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Constantinos George Panagopoulos, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD) Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darlene J. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy McCormack, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Constantinos George Panagopoulos, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, DC, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Darlene J. Davis appeals the district court's orders denying relief on her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 motion to set aside judgment and her subsequently filed revised motion to set aside judgment and motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Comcast Corp., No. 1:13-cv-01513-GBL-IDD (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 13, 2016 & entered Jan. 14, 2016; Jan. 28, 2016). We deny Davis' motion to remand in No. 16-1097. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

We note that Davis' Rule 60(b) motions were filed approaching the one-year deadline for filing such motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(c) ("A motion under Rule 60(b) must be made within a reasonable time, [and on certain grounds] no more than a year after the entry of the judgment of the judgment or order . . . ."). We need not, however, rest our decision on this basis. --------

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Davis v. Comcast Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 23, 2016
No. 16-1097 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2016)

affirming consolidated appeals

Summary of this case from Davis v. Bates
Case details for

Davis v. Comcast Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE J. DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMCAST CORPORATION, INC.; JOE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

No. 16-1097 (4th Cir. Jun. 23, 2016)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Bates

The Court takes judicial notice of the many efforts Davis has undertaken, albeit unsuccessfully, to prevent…