From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. City of S.F.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2018
Case No. 17-cv-06387-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 17-cv-06387-SI

02-15-2018

JIMMY LEE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Re: Dkt. No. 10

On January 30, 2018, Magistrate Judge Ryu issued a report and recommendation (the "Report") in this case. Dkt. No. 10. The Report recommends dismissing this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the parties had fourteen days from service of the Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Report, nor has plaintiff taken any action in this case since it was removed to this Court.

Judge Ryu noted that a court order mailed to plaintiff had been returned as undeliverable. Dkt. No. 8. However, plaintiff has not filed a change of address or provided any other reliable means of contacting him, and the Court remains unable to reach plaintiff. --------

The Court has reviewed the Report and the docket in this case. The Court agrees with Judge Ryu's analysis, and accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 15, 2018

/s/_________

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Davis v. City of S.F.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 15, 2018
Case No. 17-cv-06387-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2018)
Case details for

Davis v. City of S.F.

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY LEE DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 15, 2018

Citations

Case No. 17-cv-06387-SI (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2018)