From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Caskey

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Nov 20, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv1253-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Nov. 20, 2008)

Summary

dismissing § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust where petitioner alleging that MDOC did not give him credit for time served failed to complete the ARP process and did not seek review of the issue in state court

Summary of this case from Patton v. Bryant

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv1253-LG-RHW.

November 20, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION


This cause comes before the Court on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [60] of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered in this cause on October 22, 2008, recommending dismissal of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [1], for failure to exhaust, and denial of Motion for Relief [55]. Petitioner Tyrone Douglas Davis has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

The Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation were received by the East Mississippi Correctional Facility on October 24. On November 10, the recommendations were returned back to the Court, with the envelope marked, "Release 10/24/08. Return to sender by PARS. Unable to deliver or forward." (Dkt. No. 62). The Mississippi Department of Corrections's website indicates that Davis has been out on Earned Release Supervision since September 26, 2008. Further, he has not provided the Court with a forwarding address.

The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge properly recommended that the Petition be dismissed for failure to exhaust state remedies and the Motion for Relief be denied. After referral of hearing by this Court, no objections having been filed as to the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation, and the Court, having fully reviewed the same as well as the record in this matter, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation should be adopted as the opinion of this Court.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [60] of United States Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered on October 22, 2008, be, and the same hereby is, adopted as the finding of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [55] Motion for Relief is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the [1] Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED. A separate judgment will be entered herein in accordance with this Order as required by FED. R. CIV. P. 58.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Caskey

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division
Nov 20, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv1253-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Nov. 20, 2008)

dismissing § 2254 petition for failure to exhaust where petitioner alleging that MDOC did not give him credit for time served failed to complete the ARP process and did not seek review of the issue in state court

Summary of this case from Patton v. Bryant

stating that because petitioner "failed to fulfill his administrative remedies and did not seek review of [his claim that the MDOC failed to give him credit for time served] in state court, he has failed to exhaust his state remedies and is therefore procedurally barred from pursuing his claim in federal court"

Summary of this case from Windham v. Banks
Case details for

Davis v. Caskey

Case Details

Full title:TYRONE DOUGLAS DAVIS PETITIONER, v. DALE CASKEY, Warden of East…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 20, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:07cv1253-LG-RHW (S.D. Miss. Nov. 20, 2008)

Citing Cases

Windham v. Banks

l the ARP's decision to the appropriate circuit court (in the county where he is incarcerated or where the…

Patton v. Bryant

Though Patton appealed his conviction to the Mississippi Supreme Court, this claim did not arise until after…