While this Court acknowledges the importance of the exhaustion requirement, and recognizes the danger of permitting a Plaintiff to proceed on a claim that was not properly exhausted prior to filing the Complaint, this outcome is just and consistent with recent authority in this circuit in cases dealing with plaintiffs who had not yet received their right-to-sue letters at the time the courts decided the motions. See Davis v. Beckwith, No. 14-CV-6360W, 2014 WL 7151141, at *2 (W.D.N.Y. Dec.10, 2014) (granting Plaintiff 35 additional days to file right-to-sue letter where Plaintiff had received but not filed a right-to-sue letter for pending, unrelated case with similar claims); Janneh v. Regal Entertainment Grp., No. 07-CV-79, 2007 WL 2292981, at *3 (N.D.N.Y. Aug. 6, 2007) (dismissing claims without prejudice while Title VII claim is pending to permit Plaintiff to refile upon receipt of the right-to-sue letter); People v. Holiday Inns, Inc., 656 F.Supp. 675, 678 (W.D.N.Y. 1984) ("filing of an Amended Complaint . . . cured any such procedural defect presented by the earlier pleading").