From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Balbona

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 3, 2024
23-cv-05999-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 3, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05999-CRB (PR)

05-03-2024

WILLIS DAVIS, K70724, Plaintiff, v. M. BALBONA, M.D., et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 25, 2024, the court screened plaintiff's pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that Correctional Training Facility doctors M. Balbona and S. Posson have failed to provide him with adequate treatment and reasonable accommodations for his scoliosis and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend to set forth specific facts showing how each named individual defendant was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's serious medical needs, if possible. The court warned plaintiff that “[f]ailure to file a proper amended complaint within [28 days of this order] will result in the dismissal of this action.” ECF No. 8 at 3.

More than 38 days have passed, and plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor sought an extension of time to do so. This action accordingly is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The clerk is directed to close the case and terminate all pending motions as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Davis v. Balbona

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 3, 2024
23-cv-05999-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Davis v. Balbona

Case Details

Full title:WILLIS DAVIS, K70724, Plaintiff, v. M. BALBONA, M.D., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 3, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05999-CRB (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 3, 2024)