From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davis v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 21, 2012
1:10-CV-1452-CL (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2012)

Opinion

1:10-CV-1452-CL

08-21-2012

DOUGLAS T. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error, Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation [#36] of Magistrate Judge Clarke. This case is dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Davis v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 21, 2012
1:10-CV-1452-CL (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Davis v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS T. DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 21, 2012

Citations

1:10-CV-1452-CL (D. Or. Aug. 21, 2012)

Citing Cases

Russell v. Colvin

SSR 96-8p, available at 1996 WL 374184. The ALJ is responsible for resolving ambiguities in the record and…

Monti v. Colvin

The ALJ's rejection of Dr. Eckstein's opinion for this reason is especially curious given that "it is the…