From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Davidson v. Chisolm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 26, 2021
21-CV-656 (PGG) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-656 (PGG) (KNF)

05-26-2021

KERRY J. DAVIDSON, ESQ. c/o Law Office of Kerry J. Davidson, LLC Plaintiff, v. DAPHNE T. CHISOLM, ESQ. Defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

By a letter-motion dated May 25, 2021, the defendant requested "permission to file, under seal, Motions to Seal the Complaint and to Permit Filing of Responsive Pleadings under Seal" because the complaint contains "allegations which, if true, would clearly constitute client confidences under Rule 1.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, and which would be protected by attorney-client privilege; many of them, if they should become widely disseminated, would likely be embarrassing or detrimental and could cause significant harm to the Defendant." Docket Entry No. 14. The plaintiff consents to the relief requested in the defendant's letter-motion. Thereafter, the defendant filed an amended letter-motion to correct a typographical error. See Docket Entry No. 15.

"The burden of demonstrating that a document submitted to a court should be sealed rests on the party seeking such action." DiRussa v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc., 121 F.3d 818, 826 (2d Cir. 1997). The common law and the First Amendment rights to public access to judicial documents each requires the movant in this circuit to establish that certain conditions are met warranting sealing. See United States v. Erie Cty., N.Y., 763 F.3d 235, 238-39 (2d Cir. 2014). The defendant failed to make citation to any legal authority in support of its request for "permission to file, under seal, Motions to Seal the Complaint and to Permit Filing of Responsive Pleadings under Seal." Although the defendant asserts that "many" allegations in the complaint "would be protected by attorney-client privilege," the defendant failed to identify any ground for filing under seal the defendant's anticipated "Motions to Seal the Complaint and to Permit Filing of Responsive Pleadings under Seal." Accordingly, the defendant's letter-motion, Docket Entry No. 14, and the amended letter-motion, Docket Entry No. 15, are denied. Dated: New York, New York

May 26, 2021

SO ORDERED:

/s/_________

KEVIN NATHANIEL FOX

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Davidson v. Chisolm

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 26, 2021
21-CV-656 (PGG) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Davidson v. Chisolm

Case Details

Full title:KERRY J. DAVIDSON, ESQ. c/o Law Office of Kerry J. Davidson, LLC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 26, 2021

Citations

21-CV-656 (PGG) (KNF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 26, 2021)